INTERPRETING THE GENERAL LETTERS: AN EXEGETICAL HANDBOOK by
Herbert W. Bateman IV, Kregel, Grand
Rapids , 2013
This is another volume of the “Handbooks for New Testament
Exegesis” series. Like the earlier work of Paul’s Letters the same helpful
layout is found. It has the same basic features:
- Each chapter begins with an overview and ends with a summary of the chapter. This aids the reader in knowing where the chapter is going.
- There are very usable charts within the chapters that are understandable.
- A selected bibliography at the end.
- He also has a glossary at the end for terms an average reader may not understand.
This volume on the General Letters is surprisingly over 100
pages larger than the one on Paul’s letters. This gives an indication of
Bateman’s quality and quantity of his work. Of course, these general letters
are Hebrews, James, 1 & 2 Peter, 1, 2, & 3 John, and Jude. This
classification implies that Hebrews is not a Pauline letter.
He opens his work on the “Genre of the General Letters” (Chapter
1). In this he gives the parts of the letters and shows that these writers
follow the normal form of Ancient letters of the time. He shows how each letter
follows the form. He also has an excellent section on professional writers
which was greatly needed because of the low literary rates at the time, and
pseudonymity. He notes that using professional amanuenses (writers) was normal
at the time.
He then moves on to the “Background of the General Letters”
(Chapter 2). In this chapter, he takes a look at the Greco-Roman world with
special interest in the Judean-Roman relationship. He points out some of the
implications for interpretation because of the relationship, which he says will
vary from book to book. He does center upon wisdom (James), household codes (1
Peter), and rebellion (Jude), all of which speak to human experience rooted in
the Greco-Roman world.
He now takes a look at the “Theology of the General Letters”
(Chapter 3). He first presents the overview of the theology of the Bible is
built on the strategic plan of Promise and Fulfillment. He sees the Old
Testament presenting the Promise. The New Testament is the era of fulfillment
of the promise. “The church period is
a time in which God relates with all people through Jesus because God inaugurates
His kingdom-redemption promises through him” (page 104). These letters
indicate the kingdom portion of his program has been activated through Jews. It
is fair to say he views the promise activated redemptively in the church, but
complete promise fulfillment is in the millennial period. He is correct that
the kingdom theme is evident in these letters representing it in the
already/not yet viewpoint. He presents somewhat a dispensational view of
eschatology. On a more practical aspect of theology he shows these letters
center around a perseverance and conduct of the believer. He points to a strong
ethic emphasis in these letters. He then moves to a Biblical theology of each
letter to identify the main theme of each letter. To sum up it up, he sees the
emphasis as:
- Hebrews—Apostasy verses perseverance
- Petrine Letters—Godliness in suffering
- Johannine Letter—Relationship with God is determined by believing the truth.
- James and Jude—Living wisely and impartially with other people.
Since this is a handbook on interpreting the text, Chapter 4
deals with “Preparing to Interpret the General Letters.” The first three
important steps out of the seven he gives overall. They are:
- Step 1: Initiate a Translation
- Step 2: Identify Interpretive Issues
- Step 3: Isolate Major Textual Problems
At this point he becomes more directed and detailed on
Exegesis. He gives a step by step process and examples on how to do the process.
This chapter would be of interest to those who are interested in the history of
translation and manuscripts. He also spends time on how to use the Greek text. He
points out some key reference works and programs to aid in this task.
Chapter 5 is on “Interpreting Passages in the General
Letters.” Here he continues his points of interpretation started in the last
chapter:
- Step 4: Interpreting Structures
- Step 5: Interpreting Style, Syntax, and Semantics
- Step 6: Interpreting Greek Words
He talks and gives examples of finding structure, and points
to main verbs of independent clauses and important connectors along with the how
verbs or verbals of a dependent clause are vital to determine structure. He shows
importance of style by using Hebrews 1:1-4; syntax by looking at 1 John; and
semantics looking at 1 Peter. On interpreting Greek words he deals with some of
the difficult words in Jude. He clearly shows that exegesis must be done with
the Greek text.
Chapter 6 takes up the subject “Communicating the General
Letters.” He completes the step format in this chapter: His last three steps
are:
- Step 7: Communicating Exegetically
- Step 8: Communicating the Central Idea
- Step 9: Communicating Homiletically
He shows these steps by using 3 John. He clearly shows that
proper communication of the text is built one step at a time. The process (preparation;
interpretation; communication) is hard work, but it pays off in the transmission
of the truth of each letter. Communication of the text must be built on the
exegetical structure of the letter.
Chapter 7 is entitled “From Exegesis to Exposition of the
General Letters.” In it he gives an exposition of Jude vv.5-7 and Hebrews
10:19-25. In each he works through the steps he has just given. In each passage
he gives the Greek text; the critical issues of the text; the exegetical
outline; and the exposition of the text.
Overall, this is an excellent handbook for the exegesis of
the General Letters. I am disappointed in one aspect; he does not fully capture
the important Jewish aspect of these letters. However, I found it insightful and helpful
guide. Anyone doing work on the General Letters must have this book. It is
designed for Bible students, Pastors, and teachers. It would make a good
textbook for the academic study of the General Letters or on the subject of
exegesis.
I
received this book free from Kregel Academic in exchange for the review. I was
not required to write a positive review, and the opinions are my own.
No comments:
Post a Comment