Showing posts with label Dispensation of the Mystery. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Dispensation of the Mystery. Show all posts

Saturday, March 12, 2016

Studies in Colossians #17


Heretical Problems facing the Colossians (2:1-3:4)



A. Paul’s Concern for the Colossians (2:1-3)

This is a transition section. The word for (gar) relates these verses to the  one, and prepares one for what is to come. He turns from the sufficiency of Christ to problems that confronts and compromise this truth. He expresses his concerns for them—“For I want you to know how great a struggle I have on your behalf and for those who are at Laodicea” (2:1). “I want you to know” highlights what was is to follow. The word struggle is related to his labor and striving of verses 28-29. The word struggle (agona) reaches back to the word striving (agonizomenos). Both refer to the competing struggle of an athletic contest, usually track, but also wrestling. It is the source of the English word agony or agonizing and speaks of an agonizing struggle one is participating in. Two views are possible here: First, is the agonizing service of preaching the truth for their benefit. Second, Paul is referring to agonizing in prayer on their behalf. In light of the phrase in Colossians 4:12, it is likely that Paul is referring to prayer. Dunn says the object of this prayer is for community well-being.[1]

Paul’s labor is not limited to those he knew; it extended beyond to those he had never met. This is the clear indication of the phrase—“all those who have not personally seen my face.” Paul was not personally acquainted with these believers. He knew them only by their testimony. His knowledge of them was second hand. He never evangelized or preached in the Lycus Valley.  

Paul goes on to convey the purpose of this struggle. The word that (hina) indicates purpose. There are two purpose statements followed an expansion or explanation of that purpose.[2] I diagram this as follows:
            “That their hearts may be encouraged
                        | as they are united in love
            And [attaining] all the wealth
                        | that comes from the full assurance of understanding
                                    | in a true knowledge of God’s mystery
                        | that is Christ himself
| in whom are hidden all the treasures of wisdom and knowledge”

Purpose 1—“That their hearts may be encouraged...” (2:2). The phrase marks the main purpose clause of the paragraph. There are two key words—hearts and encouraged. The word heart (kardiai) is not the organ that pumps blood to the body. Rather it stands for the mind in Paul’s writings. Paul says it is the heart that understands (Rom. 1:21), able to believe (Rom. 10:9-10) and can be deceived (Rom. 16:18). It is the place of the will, intellect and emotion. Moo points out that,
References to the ‘heart’ in the Bible require English speakers to ‘distance’ themselves from their own culture. For the strong tendency in modern English is to use it here with reference to emotions, whereas in Scripture ‘heart’ designates the center of the personality, the source of will and thinking in addition to feeling.[3]

Encouraged is the Greek word (parakaleo)  a common word in the NT, used over 100 times, and has a number of meanings—from asking or requesting (Acts 28:20); to exhorting or urging (Luke 3:18, Eph. 4:1); to encourage or comfort (2 Cor. 1:4, 6). When used “absolutely, as here, the verb usually has a sense of comfort or encourage.”[4] O’Brien argues for the meaning of strengthen in this context, but has not been well accepted.[5] Paul wants to encourage the heart of believers.

This purpose is supported by the participial clause, which modifies the act of encouragement—“having been knit together in love”[6] (2:2). This modifier gives the element need for comfort. It is a participial clause “best taken as modifying the act of comforting.”[7] The Greek word here is participial form of symbibazo, which has the meaning to cause to come together; to unite, or knit together. There is no question that the word denotes being united. While some hold that the word has to do with and translate it being taught,[8] which is possible. It certainly is translated that way in the OT, and certain text of the NT (cf. 1 Cor. 2:16). However, in light of the rest of this epistle, united is preferred (cf. Col. 2:19; Eph. 4:16). The appeal is that of harmony which brings comfort or encouragement. The prepositional phrase in love can be instrument (united by love) or locative (united in love).[9] Love is the implement of harmony. Paul stresses that in his epistles—Romans 14:15; 1 Cor. 16:14; Phil. 2:1-2; 1 Thess. 3:12, 5:13.

Purpose 2—“And [attaining][10]all the wealth” (2:2). The word and (kai) connects this with the first purpose.[11] It is parallel to it. It is a continuation of the purpose, by adding another purpose. In the first purpose, Paul wants the believers to be encouraged or comforted, now he wants them to be edified. The verse should read—“unto all riches (or wealth).” The Greek word eis, is found over 1700 times in the NT, and has a wide range of meaning. However, it denotes motion to an object, thus the primary of “unto” something with the intent of reaching it.  The object is all wealth or riches. The Greek word is ploutos meaning wealth, abundance, or riches; it implies great value. 

The source of this wealth for the believer: “that comes from the full assurance of understanding” (2:2). The word plerophoria is used 4 times in the NT and carries the meaning of full conviction, persuasion, or assurance (here; 1 Thess. 1:5; Hebrews 6:11; 10:22). It is used of understanding, faith, and hope. There are two ways these two prepositional phrases can be understood:[12] First, to see it as a genitive of source (of full assurance) and as an objective genitive (of understanding). Second, as a genitive of content (of full assurance), and a genitive of source (of understanding). Either is possible in the Greek.[13] I prefer the second view where understanding is the source of assurance. This is more in line with Colossians 1:9. The mind that has understanding is confident in the truth.

Content of understanding is “[resulting] in a true knowledge of God’s mystery” (2:2). The first thing to notice is that the word resulting is not in the Greek text and was added by the translators. The sentence begins with the Greek preposition eis which can indication result, but is commonly used in the sense of into, in, toward. Here it defines understanding as the knowledge of the mystery of God. This and the previous phrase begin with the same preposition, and this phrase “parallels the previous phrase, but in terms of function this phrase further explains the content of the understanding.”[14] Their understanding is to be based on the knowledge of this mystery. It elaborates the word understanding.  The mystery of God identifies what we are to understand. In this light we must notice the following facts about the mystery of God:
·  It centers upon Christ (Col. 2:2) Christ is in apposition to the mystery of God. The mystery must be related and centered on Christ. The mystery of God centers in Christ as Head over the Body, the Church (Eph. 1:22).
·  The mystery concept centers upon revealed wisdom, knowledge, and understanding of truths that were at one time hidden (Eph. 3:4-5). This concept is at the very soul of progressive revelation (cf. Dan. 2:19-21; Proverbs 2:3-6).
·  The truth of the dispensation of the mystery as revealed by Paul must be grasped (Eph. 1:2, 9).
·  It entails oneness of two estranged people (Jew and Gentile), for now there is only one body of Christ, the church.  (Eph. 3:6).

Christ is described as “in whom are hidden all the treasures of wisdom and knowledge” (2:3). In whom is a relative pronoun referring to Christ. Some seem to relate and connect this to the phrase in Him in 1:16, 19. It does not seem to be connected; rather it is an addition of Christ’s status as the source of the things hidden. Moo observes: “Christ is the one in whom is to be found all that one needs in order to understand spiritual reality and to lead a life pleasing to God.”[15]

The word hidden anticipates revelation. It certainly is the heart of what happened in Christ. The word hidden indicates the manner of existence, it resides in Him. Hidden does not indicate that it is “kept concealed...but that they exist being ‘deposited’ or ‘stored up’ in Christ.”[16] In Him part of which was hidden is “now” made known or unconcealed (cf. 1:26). However we must be careful as not to make the mystery the only hidden wisdom and knowledge stored up in Christ. However in this context it is the major item that is revealed. The background is the hidden/manifest language of Col. 1:26. 

Christ is the storehouse of “all the treasures of wisdom and knowledge” (2:3). The word treasure is rare in Paul. It means that which is stored up. It denotes that which is laid up, stored, valuable and precious. It is vital we grasp that this valuable truth for the church today is stored in Christ. Wisdom and knowledge in Paul is specific, and has a dispensational as well as a spiritual meaning. In Romans 11:33 it is used in the context of God’s working of mercy and His unfathomable ways. Paul communicates God’s wisdom of the mystery which God predestined before the ages for our (the church, the body of Christ) glory (1 Cor. 2:6-7). Paul’s aim is the edification in the mystery of God that centers in Christ as Head over the body of Christ, the church.



[1]  Dunn, NIGTC: COLOSSIANS AND PHILEMON, 130.
[2] Many commentaries speak of these as being four purposes, however, that is not clear to me. I see only two main action words (encouraged/attained), the other phrases refer back to one of these words. For the four purpose view I refer you to Campbell, COLOSSIANS & PHILEMON, 82f; Harris, EGGNT: COLOSSIANS & PHILEMON, 72f.
[3]  Moo, PNTC: COLOSSIANS AND PHILEMON, 165,
[4]  Ibid, 165.
[5]  O’Brien, WBC: COLOSSIANS, PHILEMON, 82.
[6]  While the NIV has the word “and” at the beginning of this phrase, it is not in the Greek. In my opinion it should not be used in connection with this phrase.
[7]  Pao, ZECNT: COLOSSIANS & PHILEMON, 137.
[8]  O’Brien, WBC: COLOSSIANS, PHILEMON, 93
[9]  Harris, EGGNT: COLOSSIANS AND PHILEMON, 73.
[10]  Not in the text, added by translators to clarify, but I think rather it confuses.
[11]  Contra Eadie, COLOSSIANS, 111.
[12]  Pao, ZECNT: COLOSSIANS & PHILEMON, 137.
[13]  Moo is correct that the choice is not easy. Commentaries and translations vary as to which is best; [PNTC: COLOSSIANS AND PHILEMON, 167)
[14]  Pao, ZECNT: COLOSSIANS & PHILEMON, 138.
[15]  Moo, PNTC: COLOSSIANS AND PHILEMON, 169.
[16]  O’Brien, WBC: COLOSSIANS, PHILEMON, 95. 

Tuesday, November 11, 2014

Dispensation of the Mystery


Ephesians 3:1-10

Our God is a revealer of truth. He revealed truth in a certain way: Progressively. There are certain truths that are mysteries to us, until God reveals them. Our minds cannot comprehend these truths until they are revealed. When God makes them known they become “revealed mysteries.” Now they can be understood.

One of these mysteries is the dispensation in which we live—the dispensation of the mystery or grace. A dispensation is a distinct economy in the redemptive plan of God. The Greek word is oikonomia, a compound word meaning “a law of the house.” It signifies an administration or management of a household. In the history of God’s household there have been different administrations or dispensations. Most dispensationalists recognize seven: Innocence, conscience, Government, Promise, Law, Grace, and Kingdom. Today we are under the dispensation of grace.

In Ephesians 3:1-10 we see an amazing truth: the dispensation of grace is also the dispensation of the mystery. The text is clear on that point. There can be no doubt but that the phrase “dispensation of the mystery” (3:9) is identified as the “dispensation of grace” (3:2). They are not two distinct dispensations, but one and the same.

As we study this present dispensation, this passage tells us five things:

  1. ITS REVEALER: GOD
This passage twice tells us that this dispensation was “hidden in God” before it was revealed (3:3, 5, 9; cf. Colossians 1:25). This great secret was hidden in the heart of God and was never revealed to man in past generations—not to the prophets, the writers of the Old Testament, or anyone else in the past. Therefore, this dispensation will not be found in the Old Testament revelation. It was unrevealed, a secret in the heart of God. Unless He revealed it, no man would know of it. God was its revealer.

  1. ITS APOSTLE: PAUL
Paul was the instrument to whom God gave and revealed this present dispensation (3:2). He revealed it to Paul and Paul revealed it to the world. Lewis Sperry Chafer was correct when he wrote: “It was not Peter, James nor John…but to Paul only that this distinctive revelation came.”[1] C.F. Baker makes a good point when he writes: “Many dispensationalists teach that this dispensation was given to the Twelve Apostles at Pentecost, but is it not strange that not one of the Apostles said anything about it, either in the book of Acts or in their epistles?”[2] To hold that this revelation was given to anyone before Paul is a contradiction of what is taught in Ephesians 3. No wonder Paul refers to the revelation of this mystery as “my gospel” (Romans 16:25), for it was revealed to him to proclaim to the world.
  1. ITS NATURE: THE JOINT BODY OF JEW AND GENTILE
Ephesians 3:6 declares the nature of the present dispensation—God is now making a joint body of Jew and Gentile. The Gentiles and Jews are now on an equal basis. There is no longer a distinction between them. Both are being reconciled into one new man, the body of Christ (cf. Ephesians 2:11, 16). Chafer writes:
“This declaration must not be treated lightly. That the gentiles should be fellow heirs and of the same body is not a recognition of the Old Testament prediction that, during Israel’s coming kingdom glory, Gentiles will be raised to a subordinate participation in those blessings (Isa. 60:12). Those predictions were of an earthly calling, and being revealed in very much Old Testament prophecy, could not be part of the heavenly calling of the mystery hid in God. This mystery is of a present uniting of Jews and Gentiles into one body—a new divine purpose and therefore, in no sense the perpetuation of anything which has been before.”[3]
Campbell states that the importance of this is seen in the fact that: “The mystery is the sole source of authority that we Gentiles have for claiming equal status with the Jews in the body of Christ, the church.”[4]
Jews and Gentiles in this dispensation are “fellow-heirs,”—sunkleronomos, meaning co-inheritors. It denotes equality in inheritance. We are also of the “same body”—sussomos, a compound word indicating a united body. And we are “fellow-partakers”—summetochos, meaning partakers together with one another, denoting equality in participation. A Jew is not above a Gentile, nor is a Gentile above a Jew. There is no distinction; all are equal in the Church, the body of Christ. This is that nature of the dispensation of the mystery.

  1. ITS PURPOSE: MAKING KNOWN THE WISDOM OF GOD.
Ephesians 3:10 gives us the purpose of this dispensation. We have a mission on earth to win others to Christ (2 Corinthians 5), but our eternal purpose deals with the heavenlies. “That the manifold wisdom of God might now be made known through the church to the rulers and the authorities in the heavenly place.” The word “that” (iva) expresses purpose. This verse expresses three things: (1) what our purpose is. We are to make known the manifold wisdom of God. We are revealers of God’s wisdom. A wisdom that is foolishness to the world (cf. 1 Cor. 18:30). The word manifold (polupoikilos) indicates the variety and beauty of the wisdom of God as it is revealed in our salvation. (2) When it is revealed. It is “now.” The Greek word is nun and denotes time, the immediate present. (3) To whom we are revealing it: “To the rulers and the authorities in the heavenly place.” God is educating the angles through us. The phrase probably refers to both good and evil angels. 1 Peter 1:12 tells us that the angels want to now about our salvation and desire to look into it (cf. 1 Cor. 4:9). This wisdom was hid to the “princes of this world” or age. Who are these to which it was hid? It was not only the political rulers at the time of Christ, but the real rulers behind these men, are the demonic rulers of the age. The word “world” is aion, meaning age, not kosmos meaning the world or the earth. The real battle is not with earthly princes, but heavenly ones (Eph. 6:12). They did not know simply the wisdom of God, but the hidden wisdom of God, which was ordained “to our glory.” It is “through” the church that these principalities and powers are learning what they did when they crucified our Lord. Had they known this manifold wisdom of God; they would not have crucified our Lord. Why? It is because through the cross Christ has disarmed them (Col. 2:15). This was His eternal purpose in Christ (Eph. 3:11).

  1. ITS RESULT: FREE AND EQUAL ACCESS TO GOD.
Paul says in this dispensation of the mystery or grace, we have free and confident access without distinction to God (Eph. 3:12). Now there are no national, racial, or social distinctions. Under this dispensation of grace there is NO difference, all have sinned (Rom. 3:23), and all can come to Christ on the basis of faith in the finished work of Christ on the cross (Eph. 2:8-10). Now we who believe are “one in Christ” (Gal. 3:28). All have free and equal access by faith during this dispensation. No wonder Paul said that he wanted to bring to light the dispensation of the mystery. It is the manifold wisdom of God that was once hidden, but now revealed.



[1]  Lewis Sperry Chafer, THE EPHESIANS LETTER, [Dunham, Grand Rapids, 1935], 96.
[2]  C.F. Baker, UNDERSTANDING THE BODY OF CHRIST, [Grace Bible College, Grand Rapids, 1985], 28.
[3]  Chafer, 99.
[4]  Ernest R. Campbell, A COMMENTARY OF EPHESIANS [Canyonview Press, Silverton OR, 1986], 107.

Friday, August 3, 2012

OLIVET DISCOURSE #5


TIMES OF THE GENTILES
Luke 21:24



Special attention is required of the phrase: “Jerusalem shall be trodden down of the Gentiles until the times of the Gentiles be fulfilled” (Luke 21:24). In light of the events of the last 50 years, especially the Jewish possession of the city of Jerusalem since 1967, many have rushed to see fulfillment in this passage. However, Walvoord warned: “A superficial study of this passage would seem to indicate this is the case, and that now Israel is moving into a new phase of its long history. Careful students, acquainted with the history of interpretation of this verse, however, sense the danger of reaching too hasty a conclusion.”[1]

Interpretations of this verse have varied from being symbolic of Gentile spiritual prominence over the disbelieving failure of Israel, to the physical possession of the city as essential for the times to be in effect. Many conclude that the times of the Gentiles have ended. But is that the case? The answer centers upon three questions: First, what are the “the times of the Gentiles”? Second, what does “trampled underfoot” mean? Third, what event ends this time of the Gentiles? We will center our thoughts around these questions.

WHAT IS THE TIME OF THE GENTILES?

The phrase kairoi ethnon (“times of the Gentiles”) is only found in this passage in Luke. This makes it difficult to understand. When taken in context the phrase indicates the idea of Gentile supremacy and judgment. Tone of the passage indicates it is an allotted time of Gentile domination of the city.

Another phrase that is similar, but not identical, is used by Paul in Romans 11:25—“the fullness of the Gentiles.” Many feel it is related if not identical to the times of the Gentiles. Are the times of the Gentiles and the fullness of the Gentiles related? If so, how? A careful comparison and study shows that the natures of the two periods are different. The times of the Gentiles are political in nature, while the fullness of the Gentiles is spiritual. It is true that these two periods may overlap in time, but they are not identical.

The political domination of Jerusalem began in the days of the Babylonian kingdom when Jerusalem fell into the hands of that great Gentile kingdom. The event is recorded in 2 Kings 24:10-17. On March 15, 597 BC, Nebuchadnezzar marched into Jerusalem and took King Jehoiachin captive. It is at this point that the political overlording by Gentile powers began.

The prophet Daniel portrays the course of the times of the Gentiles in his prophecies. His prophecies especially handle the subject of Gentile domination and the chastisement of Israel. He gives two main prophecies that describe and speak to the course of the times of the Gentiles:

·         Daniel 2.

The figure of the great image speaks of the Gentile powers. It gives the details of who will have great domination over the world and Israel during the times of the Gentiles. Five great Gentile empires and powers are presented by the various elements of the image. It is generally acknowledged the gold represents the Babylonian empire; the silver, the Medo-Persian empire; the brass, the Grecian empire; the iron, the Roman empire; and the mixture of iron and clay as the revived Roman empire. Four of the five empires have already entered and exited the stage of history, although Phillips notes that the “Roman empire has actually lived on down through the centuries in the languages and laws of the West.”[2] The fifth empire is yet to appear. Attempts at revival of the old roman empire have all but failed thus far in history. Someday there will be “ten toes” (nations) that will eventually succeed in this revival. Ten nations will come to form a revival of the great Roman empire. Many look for revival to succeed by means of the European common market.

·         Daniel 7

This second prophecy covers the same kingdoms, only under the images of beasts. The nations are represented differently because of the viewpoints of the two chapters. Daniel 2 looks at the kingdom from a human viewpoint, while chapter 7 presents the divine viewpoint. Harry Bultema communicates this well, writing: “The heathen king saw everything from the human and terrestrial point of view, and for that reason the world was a striking image of mankind. Daniel considered the world in its striking image of mankind. Daniel considered the world in its essence and judged it moral quality and so saw it as wild and savage beasts. The heathen king saw in Christ nothing more than a dislodged rock rolling down the mountainside; Daniel saw him as the Son of Man, coming in majesty and glory.”[3]
 

In both passages, Daniel gives the times of the Gentiles a very precise beginning and ending. It began with the Babylonian king Nebuchadnezzar taking Jerusalem and will end with the second Coming of Christ in Glory (Daniel 2:44-45; 7:27). Thus, the time of the Gentiles is the time of Gentile political rule and influence over Jerusalem that will end when “the stone cut out without hands,” destroys that rule and influence.

The “fullness of the Gentiles” on the other hand, refers to the spiritual rule or influence given to the Gentiles by God over and apart from the nation Israel. Israel during this time is spiritually set aside. Before this time of fullness which will be during the time of the Gentiles, blessings will are to be received by and through the Jews (Esther 8:15-17). Even during the ministry of our Lord on earth, he declared that “salvation is of the Jews.” During this time the Gentiles were still strangers from the covenants and without God in the world (Ephesians 2:12).

Today that is no longer the case. With the ministry of the Apostle Paul we see a turning of salvation away from the Jews unto the Gentiles (Acts 13:46; 28:28). This marks the beginning of Israel’s spiritual fall. It marks a time when salvation comes to the Gentiles, not by Israel’s rule as predicted in the Old Testament (Isaiah 2:3; 25:7; 60:1-3; Jeremiah 3:17; Zechariah 8:20ff), but by their spiritual fall (Romans 11:11) and partial blindness (Romans 11:25). Dwight Pentecost perceptively notes that, “this blindness is a mystery which shows that it is a kind of blindness hitherto unrevealed. Therefore it must be distinguished from both the spiritual blindness, which was the experience of Israel as children of Adam and therefore under the curse of sin, and from willful blindness, which was Israel’s experience in sinning against revealed light. This is a new form of blindness, not hitherto experienced by men. It was the divine visitation of Israel by God because of the national sin of rejecting the Messiah.”[4]

The nature of this blindness is seen in the Greek word porosis. It means to cover, a callus. It suggests that Israel had a callus over their eyes so they could not and cannot see the truth of the gospel as a nation or people. It is partial, showing that it is not individual, for an individual Jew may still come to understand the gospel and be saved. It does suggest that national repentance and salvation is not possible during this time.

This is part of what Paul identifies as the “dispensation of the mystery” (Ephesians 3:9). The apostle defines the characteristics of this mystery as Gentiles being “fellow-heirs and fellow-members of the body, and fellow-partakers of the promise in Christ through the gospel” (Ephesians 3:6). The fullness of the Gentiles is the unique combination of the political and spiritual downfall of the nation Israel that has produced a fullness of spiritual riches and inheritance to the Gentiles, not through the fullness of Israel, but through the Church. It involves the times of the Gentiles, in that it happens within that period, but in and of itself was a mystery until revealed to and through Paul for this present dispensation. The two phrases do not refer to the same thing.

WHAT DOES “TRAMPLED UNDERFOOT” MEAN?

Because of the 1967 war when Jerusalem for the first time in centuries was again under the control of the nation Israel, some have looked upon that as a partial, if not complete, fulfillment of times of the Gentiles. In the light of those events, one must take a look at these words carefully.

The phrase “trampled under foot” is only one word in the Greek text, a present passive participle of pateo. It is transitive meaning to tread underfoot. Thayer says it denotes “to treat with insult and contempt.”[5] Seesemann says that in the Old Testament when the word is used, it means to disparage, it implies arrogance.[6] In Revelation 19:20 it is used figuratively of God and denotes judgment.

The word therefore does not need to be taken as actual physical occupation, but must at least speak of influence and domination of some type. There can be no question that today Jerusalem continues to be greatly influenced by the West, and dominated by its Gentile contempt and arrogance. If it were not for Gentile support and assistance of the West, the city would not be in the hands of Israel today. It is a divided city nationally, and still experiences the contempt and arrogance of much of the Gentile world.

THE EVENT THAT ENDS THE TIMES OF THE GENTILES

Inherent in the phrase “until the times of the Gentiles be fulfilled” is that this period will end and be terminated. The facts of political domination of the Gentiles will not only be the time is limited, but it will end with a degree of vindication. The formula in Luke is to immediately travel forward to when this time will be fulfilled—the return of Christ (Luke 21:25-28). Every prophecy related to the fulfillment of the times of the Gentiles points to this great cosmic event (cf. Daniel 2:44-45; 7:26-27). The connection cannot be denied. The end of the times of the Gentiles and the second Coming of Christ are woven together in Scripture. In this light, we can say that this time has not yet ended. We are still living in this time frame.

Contemporary events are not to be construed as fulfillment. This does not mean that they are unimportant. The importance must be seen in the light of prophetic Scripture. Before the fulfillment can be complete, Israel must be in the land and possess the city. Prophecy takes that for granted. When the end comes, Israel will be a nation, have control of the city, and the temple will be standing (Revelation 11:1). It is when the temple is standing that the last treading under foot will occur. Revelation 11:2 says it will last 42 months. Contemporary events are setting the stage for the coming final events predicted in the Olivet discourse. Stage setting must not be confused with fulfillment. The play does not start until the stage has completely been set.

In conclusion there are three reasons the times of the Gentiles has not been fulfilled:

·         The times of the Gentiles are not complete for the Lord Jesus Christ has not returned. His coming ends this period.

·         The fullness of the Gentiles is present and has not been completed. The evidence of this is the presence of the Church and the lack of Israel’s conversion to Christ.

·         Prophecy of another treading of the city is predicted in Zechariah 12:3 and Revelation 11:2. Both passages are still to be fulfilled and speak of the future Tribulation period.



[1]  John F. Walvoord, “The Times of the Gentiles” BIBLOTHECA SACRA, January 1968, 3.
[2]  John Phillips, EXPLORING THE FUTURE, 33.
[3]  Harry Bultema, COMMENTARY ON DANIEL, 200.
[4]  J. Dwight Pentecost, THINGS TO COME, 302.
[5]  Joseph H Thayer, GREEK-ENGLISH LEXICON OF THE NEW TESTAMENT, 494.
[6]  M. Seeseman, “Pateo,” THE DICTIONARY OF THE NEW TESTAMENT, (Abridged), 804.